U.S. Department of Justice  ·  Civil Rights Division United States v. Regents of the University of California  ·  Central District of California
Read Complaint →
  • 🏛Plaintiff: United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division
  • 🎓Defendant: University of California / UCLA (Los Angeles campus)
  • Legal basis: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 — race and national origin discrimination
  • 📋Allegation: Deliberate indifference to a pervasive antisemitic hostile educational environment targeting Jewish and Israeli students
  • 💰Additional breach: Falsely certifying Title VI compliance while accepting federal funding contracts and grants
  • 📍Filed: Central District of California

WASHINGTON / LOS ANGELES — The Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division has filed a federal lawsuit against the University of California for its deliberate indifference to race and national origin discrimination against Jewish and Israeli students at its UCLA campus — marking one of the most consequential federal civil rights actions against an American university in recent history. The action charges UCLA with violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by tolerating a hostile educational environment that left Jewish and Israeli students physically assaulted, excluded from campus, and deprived of their right to education.

The lawsuit, filed in the Central District of California, stems from the Department’s investigation into a wave of antisemitic incidents at UCLA following the Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023 — and from written findings concluding that UCLA failed to fulfill its legal obligations under federal civil rights law in responding to those incidents. It is the second federal civil rights action brought against UCLA in connection with its treatment of Jewish members of the campus community: earlier this year, the Department sued UCLA for subjecting its Jewish and Israeli employees to an antisemitic hostile work environment.

HKD
Harmeet K. Dhillon Assistant Attorney General  ·  DOJ Civil Rights Division
“Earlier this year, we sued UCLA for subjecting its Jewish and Israeli employees to an antisemitic hostile work environment. Now, the Department of Justice calls UCLA to account for its toleration of the equally appalling hostile educational environment against its Jewish and Israeli students.”
BE
Bill Essayli First Assistant U.S. Attorney  ·  Central District of California
“Universities have an obligation to maintain safe and inclusive campuses for all students. Universities that violate our nation’s civil rights laws by repeatedly failing to shield Jewish students from antisemitism will be held accountable.”

From October 7 to April 2024: A Campus Descends Into Hatred

According to the DOJ complaint, following the Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023, antisemitic hatred at UCLA intensified dramatically — reaching a point where Jewish and Israeli students were physically assaulted, injured, excluded from their own campus, and systematically deprived of educational opportunities because of their perceived Jewish or Israeli heritage. UCLA, the complaint alleges, responded with deliberate indifference at every turn.

The crisis reached a flash point in April 2024, when masked demonstrators erected an encampment outside Royce Hall — one of UCLA’s most iconic academic buildings — and launched a sustained campaign of violence and blockade against Jewish and Israeli students.

⚠ Documented Violence — Royce Hall Encampment, April 2024

  • 🥊Jewish and Israeli students were slapped, kicked, and beaten with sticks by masked demonstrators
  • 🌶Students were doused with pepper spray by encampment occupiers
  • 😵Jewish and Israeli students were knocked unconscious during the attacks
  • 🚧Occupiers formed “human phalanxes” to physically block Jewish and Israeli students from entering academic buildings
  • 🎓Students were excluded from campus and deprived of educational opportunities because of their perceived Jewish or Israeli identity

“Universities that violate our nation’s civil rights laws by repeatedly failing to shield Jewish students from antisemitism will be held accountable.”

— First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli

The Legal Case: Title VI and Federal Funding Fraud

The DOJ’s lawsuit charges UCLA on two distinct but related grounds. First, the university violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 through its deliberate indifference to pervasive on-campus antisemitism targeting students on the basis of race and national origin. Second — and perhaps more consequentially — UCLA breached its federal funding contracts and grants by falsely certifying compliance with Title VI duties while simultaneously allowing discrimination against Jewish and Israeli students to infect its campus.

⚖ What the DOJ Complaint Alleges

  • 1 Title VI Violation: UCLA demonstrated deliberate indifference to a pervasive, hostile educational environment targeting Jewish and Israeli students on the basis of race and national origin — a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • 2 Federal Funding Fraud: UCLA breached its contracts and grants with the United States government by certifying compliance with Title VI obligations while knowingly allowing unlawful discrimination against Jewish and Israeli students to persist on campus.
  • 3 Physical Violence and Exclusion: Under UCLA’s watch, Jewish and Israeli students were physically assaulted, pepper-sprayed, knocked unconscious, and blocked from entering academic buildings by masked demonstrators operating in an encampment outside Royce Hall in April 2024.

📌 Second Action Against UCLA This Year

This is the second federal civil rights lawsuit brought against UCLA in 2026. Earlier this year, the DOJ sued UCLA for subjecting Jewish and Israeli employees to an antisemitic hostile work environment. Together, the two lawsuits represent a comprehensive federal civil rights reckoning with UCLA’s institutional failures to protect its Jewish community — both as workers and as students.

A Message to Every American University

The DOJ’s action against UCLA carries ramifications that extend far beyond the Los Angeles campus. By invoking both Title VI and the terms of federal funding agreements, the Justice Department is signaling clearly that universities which accept federal money have a legal — not merely moral — obligation to protect Jewish students from discrimination and violence.

Assistant Attorney General Dhillon’s framing makes the stakes explicit: this is not a political dispute about Middle East policy. It is a civil rights enforcement action. Jewish and Israeli identity is protected under federal law, and universities that respond with deliberate indifference to hate-motivated violence against students who hold that identity will face federal accountability — in court, and through their funding.

Official Sources: Read the DOJ Complaint →

Faith & Freedom News will continue to follow the progress of this landmark civil rights lawsuit and its implications for Jewish students at UCLA and universities across the United States.