The Abrahamic Movement in Iraq, represented by Abu Musa Al-Iraqi alongside Sunni scholar Abu Musa and Professor Tom Wegner, has issued a sweeping statement in response to criticism published in the Egyptian Al-Bayan magazine — delivering a Quranic-grounded defense of Jewish-Muslim brotherhood and a comprehensive indictment of the Iranian regime’s regional ambitions.

The statement, issued in the name of the Global Abrahamic Movement and its founding members, represents one of the most theologically grounded public declarations by a Muslim reform movement affirming Jewish rights and condemning antisemitism from within the Islamic tradition.

A Quranic Foundation for Abrahamic Unity

At the heart of the statement lies a direct appeal to the Quran itself — challenging what the Movement describes as “intellectually contaminated Islamic scholars” who represent, in their words, a tiny minority distorting the faith for personal and political gain.

“And who would be averse to the religion of Abraham except one who makes a fool of himself? And We had chosen him in this world, and indeed he, in the Hereafter, will be among the righteous.”
Surah Al-Baqarah, Verse 130

The Movement invokes Moses’ address to the Children of Israel as direct Quranic confirmation of Jewish connection to the Holy Land — a passage they argue is unambiguous in its meaning and binding in its authority.

“O my people, remember the favor of Allah upon you when He appointed among you prophets and made you kings and gave you that which He had not given anyone among the worlds. O my people, enter the Holy Land which Allah has destined for you…”
Surah Al-Ma’idah, Verses 20–21
Abrahamism, according to the Quran, is one continuous path from our Prophet Abraham to Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad. Islam, as expressed in the Quran, believes in the heavenly books — and they are one.
— Abrahamic Movement in Iraq, Official Statement

The statement draws on classical Islamic scholarship, citing Imam Al-Baydawi’s interpretation that the religious law from Abraham and Noah to the Prophet Muhammad is continuous and unified — reinforcing that hostility toward the Jewish people contradicts this foundational theological position.

“And We already gave the Children of Israel the Scripture and judgement and prophethood, and We provided them with good things and preferred them over the worlds.”
Surah Al-Jathiyah, Verse 16
“O Children of Israel, remember My favor which I have bestowed upon you and that I preferred you over the worlds.”
Surah Al-Baqarah, Verse 47

About the Abrahamic Movement in Iraq

  • Founded by Abu Musa Al-Iraqi, the Movement operates within the Global Abrahamic framework advocating for Sunni-Jewish-Christian reconciliation rooted in shared prophetic heritage.
  • The Movement includes among its intellectual contributors Sunni scholar Abu Musa and Professor Tom Wegner.
  • Its theological framework draws on classical Quranic exegesis, including the scholarship of Imam Al-Baydawi, to argue that authentic Islam affirms Jewish rights and condemns antisemitism.
  • The statement was issued in direct response to criticism published in Egypt’s Al-Bayan magazine by an individual identified as Atef Abdel Ghani.
The Iranian Infiltration — A Documented Indictment

The second half of the statement pivots sharply — directing a detailed indictment at the Iranian regime and what the Movement characterizes as its decades-long project of subverting Arab and Muslim societies under the banner of the “resistance” and the export of the Islamic Revolution.

The Movement accuses the Egyptian publication and its author of deliberate silence on Iran’s regional activities — arguing that this silence amounts to an endorsement of terrorism, and that authentic Islamic scholarship demands confronting rather than accommodating the regime’s record.

Iranian Regime — Documented Record of Destabilization

1979
Expansionist declarations: Iranian official Mohammad Mehdi Sadeqi publicly declared plans to extend the revolution into Mecca and Afghanistan. Books such as Categories in National Strategy by Mohammad Javad Larijani outlined Iran’s ambition to become the “Mother of Cities” (Umm al-Qura) in place of Mecca.
1983
Khomeini’s war doctrine: Published in Al-Dastour magazine, Khomeini wrote: “We need war to purify our society, and even if the war with Iraq ends, we must start another war elsewhere” — naming Baghdad, Amman, Ankara, Riyadh, Damascus, Cairo, Kuwait, Muscat, Kabul, and Karachi as targets for Iranian expansionism.
1987
Attack on Mecca: Iran, through the Revolutionary Guards, armed Juhayman al-Otaibi and facilitated the holding of pilgrims hostage inside the Grand Mosque in Mecca — an operation the Movement describes as reflecting “the extent of moral deviance against the sound nature of Islam and humanity.”
2007
Declared regional control: Shia scholar Al-Korani stated that the Shia Hawza in Qom seeks to control the Hejaz, the Levant, and Iraq — and that the extension of Shia Iran has “no geographical borders.”
Ongoing
Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen, Syria: Proxy financing, arms smuggling, drug trafficking, mass graves, the killing of Iraqis based on Sunni identity, the liquidation of scientists and doctors, the displacement of Christians, the usurpation of Jewish real estate, and the detention of Iraqi prisoners more than 45 years after the Iran-Iraq war ended.
Ongoing
Diplomatic violations: The storming of the Saudi embassy in Tehran, repeated occupation of the three Emirati islands, and continuous efforts described in the book National Awakening or Sleepers as a direct plan to invade Arab countries.
Does Islam, the Quran, and the Sunnah of the Prophet accept the continuation of this hostility, manufactured by some clerics to gain personal and financial benefits from kings and rulers during past eras?
— Abrahamic Movement in Iraq, Official Statement
The Crossroads — A Historic Choice

The statement concludes with a stark framing of the choice now facing the peoples of the Middle East — presenting two incompatible paths and calling on the region to declare itself for Abrahamic peace over revolutionary violence.

Path One — Rejection

Standing with a “bloody, extremist regime living in regional and international isolation, using murder and violence as a path to expansionist goals, relying on a distorted historical legacy it created for itself to claim legitimacy.”

Path Two — The New Middle East

Choosing to be part of “the new Middle East within the new civilized global system” — asserting the right of peoples to self-determination, peace, and a future within the true Middle East built on Abrahamic values.

FFN Analysis — Significance of the Statement

The Abrahamic Movement in Iraq’s statement is remarkable for what it does theologically: it does not merely call for interfaith dialogue as a social good — it argues from within the Islamic scriptural tradition that hostility toward Jews contradicts the Quran, that the Holy Land was divinely designated for the Children of Israel, and that the long war of manufactured antisemitism has served Persian-Iranian imperial ambitions rather than authentic Islamic teaching.

In the current geopolitical moment — as the US-Iran MOU opens new diplomatic space and Israel-Lebanon talks advance in Washington — a voice from within Iraq’s Muslim community making precisely this argument carries particular weight. It reflects a growing reform current across the Arab and Muslim world that sees Abrahamic reconciliation not as a concession but as a return to scriptural roots.

The declaration of an “Abrahamic Revolution” signals that the Movement intends to move beyond statements and into sustained advocacy — positioning itself as a counterweight to both Iranian proxy culture and the legacy of clerical antisemitism embedded in parts of the regional religious establishment.

The statement closes with a declaration that carries both spiritual and political weight: “The Abrahamic peace brings us together. Peace for humanity, Peace for the Middle East.” — affirming the Movement’s conviction that the path forward is not through armed resistance or revolutionary ideology, but through the rediscovery of the shared prophetic heritage that, in their reading of the Quran, has always united the Children of Abraham.