📋 Landmark Report Released

“Silence No More” — Israel’s Civil Commission on Oct. 7 Crimes by Hamas Against Women and Children

Released after two years of meticulous research, the report provides comprehensive, hard evidence on the sexual atrocities carried out by Hamas on October 7, 2023 — drawing on official records, interviews with more than 430 witnesses, survivors, and family members, over 10,000 photographs, and more than 1,800 hours of video.

430+ Witnesses Interviewed 10,000+ Photographs 1,800+ Hours of Video 2 Years of Research

OPINION — Last week, Israel’s Civil Commission on October 7th Crimes by Hamas Against Women and Children released its comprehensive report, “Silence No More,” after two years of meticulous research, interviews with survivors, and an analysis of photographs and video evidence. It is a much-needed document. It provides hard evidence to counter the conspiracy theories and fake news surrounding the horrendous sexual atrocities carried out by Hamas on October 7, 2023.

As always, there are the naysayers. In a scandalous article that seems to have been strategically timed to be released the day before the “Silence No More” report, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof countered the brutal attacks of Hamas by claiming that there has been sexual violence committed against Palestinian prisoners in Israel — including the alleged use of trained dogs to rape prisoners.

⚠ The Kristof Column — Questions of Credibility

The article has been called into question by numerous experts. Michael Gould, a canine behaviour expert who previously served with the New York Police Department’s canine unit, told National Review that it is “absurd” to think dogs can be trained to rape humans. James Crosby, a retired police officer and canine expert, similarly told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that it is “highly unlikely that anybody is going to be able to train a dog to successfully commit a sexual assault.”

A Column Built on Shaky Foundations

Beyond the scientific implausibility of its central claim, Kristof’s column relied on reports from anti-Israel organizations — most notably the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, which has previously circulated false or unverified claims about Israel, including the dog rape conspiracy theory itself. His reporting depends primarily on anonymous sources. The named sources it does cite have deeply checkered pasts, and their accounts have changed over time.

🔍 Credibility Problems in Kristof’s Sources

  • Sami al-Sai (freelance journalist, named source): Jailed twice — in 2016 and 2024 — on charges of supporting violence or terrorism. Has a documented history of celebrating Hamas’s atrocities. Watchdog group HonestReporting found numerous discrepancies between the account he gave Kristof and one he gave a human rights organization in early 2025.
  • Issa Amro (second named source): Found to have given a different account of his alleged abuse to the Washington Post in 2024 than the one told to Kristof.
  • Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor (cited organization): Has previously circulated false or unverified claims about Israel, including the dog rape conspiracy theory that Kristof’s column is built upon.
  • Anonymous sources: The majority of the column’s claims rest on sources whose identities cannot be verified or scrutinized.

Israel’s Foreign Ministry did not mince words in its response, calling the Kristof column an “unfathomable inversion of reality” based on “an endless stream of baseless lies.” This stands in stark contrast to the civil commission’s report, which is built on official records, interviews with more than 430 witnesses, survivors and family members, more than 10,000 photographs, and over 1,800 hours of video of the attacks and other primary-source materials.

✓ “Silence No More” Report — Civil Commission

  • Official records and sworn testimonies
  • 430+ witnesses, survivors, and family members
  • 10,000+ photographs reviewed
  • 1,800+ hours of attack video analyzed
  • Two years of meticulous research
  • Independent legal and evidentiary framework

✗ Kristof / NYT Column — Credibility Issues

  • Primarily anonymous sources
  • Named sources with jailed terrorist ties
  • Sourced from anti-Israel organizations (Euro-Med)
  • Experts call central claim “absurd”
  • Sources gave contradictory accounts elsewhere
  • Timed day before landmark Hamas report

“We should not allow people like Kristof to hijack the narrative and prevent the victims of Hamas’s brutality from having their stories heard and seeking the justice they so rightly deserve.”

— Raheel Raza, President, Council for Muslims Against Antisemitism

The Pattern of Silence — and Denial

Raza notes that the timing of Kristof’s column fits into a broader, troubling pattern: in the immediate aftermath of October 7, there was widespread silence and denial about the sexual violence perpetrated by Hamas against innocent Israeli civilians. Feminist groups, women’s rights groups, the United Nations, and many in the media refused to engage with the issue — with some claiming the rapes, mutilations, and other horrors had not happened at all, or that there was not enough evidence to substantiate such claims.

📌 A Pattern of Erasure

The timing of Kristof’s column — released the day before the “Silence No More” report — follows what critics describe as a consistent strategy: use mainstream media platforms to flood the news cycle with counter-narratives just as documented evidence of Hamas’s atrocities is about to receive renewed attention. Israel’s Foreign Ministry described it as “an unfathomable inversion of reality.”

Muslim Voices Who Spoke Truth — Early and Loudly

Raza, as president of the Council of Muslims Against Antisemitism (CMAA), writes that her organization recognized the truth of Hamas’s sexual violence early — and acted on it. As Muslims well-versed in Islamist ideology, CMAA understood that weaponizing sexual violence as a tool of war was not outside the realm of possibility for Hamas.

✦ Muslim Leaders Speak Out — Toronto, March 3, 2024

“Women on the Frontlines: Muslim Leaders Speak Out Against the Sexual Violence of October 7”
Raheel Raza — CMAA Ruth Halperin-Kaddari — The Dinah Project Asra Nomani — Pearl Project Zuhdi Jasser — Muslim Reform Movement Soraya Deen — Muslim Women Speakers Movement + 3 additional speakers

Hosted jointly by CMAA and Secure Canada, the event featured seven Muslim speakers who spoke truth to power about Hamas’s use of sexual violence — five months after the October 7 attack and long before the mainstream media was willing to engage with the issue. All speakers condemned the brutal Hamas attack and its use of sexual violence without equivocation.

RK
Ruth Halperin-Kaddari Israeli Legal Scholar & Co-Author, “A Quest for Justice: October 7 and Beyond”  ·  The Dinah Project
“For victims of sexual crimes, recognition is inseparable from the possibility of justice. It is never merely symbolic: it forms a necessary step in the process of healing and the restoration of dignity.”
SD
Soraya Deen Lawyer & Founder, Muslim Women Speakers Movement
“Hamas desecrated Islam by taking women, children and the elderly as hostages. The mass rape and murder of Jewish women was an affront to humanity.”

Journalist Asra Nomani — founder of the Pearl Project, established to investigate the murder of her Wall Street Journal colleague Daniel Pearl — described herself as inspired by the Toronto event and its panel of “brave voices” from within the Muslim community.

The Stakes of Getting This Right

The Dinah Project, founded by Halperin-Kaddari, subsequently published a book — “A Quest for Justice: October 7 and Beyond” — described as “the first comprehensive legal and evidentiary framework to analyze the systematic use of sexual violence as a weapon of war during the October 7 Hamas attacks on Israel.”

The contrast between this painstaking work and the opportunistic timing of Kristof’s column could not be starker. Where the civil commission report spent two years building an evidentiary record from primary sources, Kristof spent his column tearing it down — relying on sources with documented ties to Hamas, organizations that have previously spread disinformation about Israel, and claims that experts in the relevant field have described as impossible.

Raza’s conclusion is unambiguous: the victims of October 7 deserve recognition, justice, and the truth. Those who would use the pages of the New York Times to reframe, redirect, or erase that truth are not merely wrong — they are complicit in the continued suffering of those victims.