Reporting through the lens of faith & liberty
Nasser, Arafat, the Assads, Khomeini, Khamenei, Nasrallah: The Men Who Stole Lebanon
Seventy-five years of paying other people’s bills — a debt Lebanon was forced to carry for choices made in Cairo, Damascus, and Tehran. The Arab order needed a country small enough to absorb its failures. Lebanon was that country.
The figures whose ambitions, ideologies, and armed projects were financed — in blood, sovereignty, and future — by the Lebanese people across seventy-five years.
Seventy-five years of paying other people’s bills. It was a debt Lebanon was forced to pay for choices made in Cairo, Damascus, and Tehran. The Arab order needed a country small enough to absorb its failures. The Iranian theocracy needed a forward base. Lebanon was both.
Nasser exported the burden. Arafat planted the franchise. The 1969 Cairo Agreement legalized an armed state inside Lebanese borders — Lebanon’s first official surrender of sovereignty, signed under Egyptian pressure, against every Lebanese interest. Hafez al-Assad turned the country into his security depth and called it brotherhood. Khomeini’s heirs built Hezbollah on the rubble the PLO left behind. Nasrallah inherited the franchise. Bashar wore the same occupation in a different uniform.
“The 1969 Cairo Agreement legalized an armed state inside ours: Lebanon’s first official surrender of sovereignty, signed under Egyptian pressure, against every Lebanese interest.”
— Bechara Gerges, @BecharaGergesEvery Generation Paid the Bill
Every Lebanese generation since 1948 paid the bill: Damour, the mountain war, the South, the displaced, the emigrated, the disappeared, the assassinated — and an entire Christian demographic collapse engineered in someone else’s name.
They Taught Us to Call It Solidarity
The obscenity is not that they used Lebanon. It is that they taught the Lebanese to call it solidarity — and that for too long, too many did. Each armed project arrived wrapped in the language of resistance, liberation, or Arab unity. Each one left Lebanon smaller, poorer, and more fractured than it found it.
“The obscenity is not that they used us. It is that they taught us to call it solidarity, and we let them.”
— Bechara GergesPan-Arabism demanded Lebanon sacrifice its stability for Cairo’s prestige. The Palestinian armed movement demanded it sacrifice its south — and eventually its state institutions — for a cause that produced no Palestinian state and no Lebanese peace. The Iranian project demanded Lebanon surrender its future to a regional confrontation decided in Tehran.
The Debt Was Paid in Full
Lebanon owes the Palestinians, Tehran, and Damascus nothing. The debt was paid in full: in blood, in country, in economy, in security, in peace, and in future.
That is not indifference to Palestinian suffering, nor hostility to any people. It is an accounting of sovereign cost — the recognition that a small nation was used as raw material for everyone else’s wars, and that the price of that use has been catastrophic and unreciprocated.
Lebanon’s obligation now is not to the ideological projects that consumed it. It is to its own people, its own sovereignty, and its own future — a future that can only be built once the Lebanese stop being charged for debts they never agreed to carry.
About The Author
Discover more from Faith & Freedom News - FFN
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.