In a sweeping formal declaration disseminated across international platforms, Emirati legal advocate and commentator Hind Al Dhaheri has called on INTERPOL, the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), and the social media platform X to treat the online broadcasting of a countdown to a missile strike as a prosecutable act of digital terrorism — not a protected form of free expression.

Her calls follow a sequence of events that she argues forms a clear causal chain from an online post to a real-world kinetic strike against sovereign Emirati territory.

The Timeline: From Digital Countdown to Missile Strike

“On May 1, 2026, the account @Q_98C utilized the X platform to broadcast a public countdown to the bombing and assault of the Fujairah Port in my beloved country,” Al Dhaheri wrote, “transforming a social media platform into a military command and control center.”

The Legal Framework: Digital Acts as Direct Participation in Hostilities

Al Dhaheri grounds her demands in a detailed and layered framework of international law. Responding publicly to @Sajwani, she argues that account suspension mischaracterizes the gravity of the situation — this is not a content moderation matter but a criminal prosecution one.

“The issue here is not about suspending accounts or taking a mere technical administrative measure,” Al Dhaheri states. “We are facing an international criminal classification of an act of aggression in which the account transformed from a platform for expression into a command and control system by issuing a countdown for a military attack with missiles and drones.”

Demands to INTERPOL: Red Notices and Global Pursuit

Al Dhaheri formally calls on INTERPOL to activate Red Notices against the perpetrators, citing the organization’s authority in handling transnational cybercrime and terrorism. She points specifically to the archive of metadata and digital footprints left by the account’s attack on Fujairah Port as a basis for issuing international pursuit notices.

“Every airport you enter will be a potential trap, and every financial asset you own is now a target for seizure and freezing under UN Security Council resolutions,” she warns, addressing those responsible directly. “@INTERPOL_HQ is the hand of international justice coming to collect its debt.”

Demands to UN Human Rights: Classify Digital Incitement as Atrocity

Al Dhaheri urges the OHCHR to immediately investigate the violation of civilians’ right to life and to formally classify digital incitement as a tool for committing atrocity crimes. She notes the OHCHR’s “Special Procedures” mechanism as carrying authority to investigate how digital incitement facilitates such crimes and to hold both states and digital platforms accountable for hosting “command-and-control” operations on their servers.

Warning to X and Elon Musk: Material Support for Terrorism

In sharp terms, Al Dhaheri issues a warning to the X platform itself. Addressing @elonmusk, @Safety, and @lindayaX directly, she contends that a platform hosting a countdown to a mass killing operation without immediate intervention “shifts from a mere carrier to a logistical supporter of terrorism.”

She also addresses @UN_OCT (the UN Office of Counter-Terrorism) and @FATFNews (the Financial Action Task Force), calling on them to examine the digital fingerprint and consider asset-tracking actions against those involved.

Sovereignty as a Red Line

Al Dhaheri closes her formal statement with an assertion of Emirati sovereignty and legal resolve, framing the UAE as a “state of law” fully entitled — and obligated — under international law to pursue those who used “the word as a fuse for the bomb.”

“We are not suspending them to silence them,” she writes, “but documenting their crimes to prosecute them. Emirati sovereignty is not violated digitally without a heavy criminal price.”

Her statement concludes: “The daughter of the Emirates, its voice, its shield. The Emirates stands eternal: unbreakable, sovereign, and forever victorious.”

Primary Sources