In an extraordinary breach of diplomatic protocol, Thailand’s Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow abandoned his prepared remarks at the United Nations General Assembly’s 80th session, delivering instead a scathing rebuke of Cambodia over escalating border tensions that have brought the two Southeast Asian neighbors to the brink of renewed conflict.
“We know who are the real victims: they are Thai soldiers who have lost their legs from landmines, children whose schools were shelled, and innocent civilians who were shopping that day at the grocery store that came under attack from Cambodian rocket fire.”
— H.E. Sihasak Phuangketkeow, Thai Foreign Minister
The dramatic confrontation unfolded after Minister Sihasak arrived in New York specifically to address what Thai officials describe as a dangerous escalation along their shared border. According to Ministry spokesman Nikorndej Balankura, the Foreign Minister had conducted intensive diplomatic consultations with world leaders throughout the week, building international support for Thailand’s position before delivering his pointed address to the global community.
Speaking to the assembled delegates at the United Nations General Assembly, Minister Sihasak revealed the extraordinary circumstances that led to his last-minute revision of his prepared speech, telling the assembly he “had to rewrite the speech because of the most regrettable remarks by my Cambodian colleague” delivered earlier in the day.
Strategic Diplomatic Consultations
▼
High-Level International Engagement
Minister Sihasak’s diplomatic offensive included carefully orchestrated meetings with key international partners, each serving strategic purposes in Thailand’s broader campaign to internationalize the border dispute while maintaining legitimacy through established multilateral frameworks.
Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya: As chair of the Ottawa Convention governing anti-personnel mines, this meeting was crucial for addressing Cambodia’s alleged deployment of landmines during the current border conflict. Thailand sought to leverage the treaty’s mechanisms to pressure Cambodia into “ceasing violations” and returning to agreed landmine clearing efforts.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov: With Russia preparing to assume the UN Security Council presidency next month, this consultation focused on securing support for bilateral mechanisms to address the border situation peacefully and prevent further escalation.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres and General Assembly President Annalena Baerbock: These meetings emphasized Thailand’s unwavering commitment to the UN Charter and peaceful dispute resolution mechanisms, while positioning Thailand as a responsible actor in the crisis.
UN Special Envoy on Myanmar Julie Bishop: Beyond the Cambodia crisis, discussions addressed Thailand’s broader regional concerns, including the need for inclusive electoral processes and greater social participation in Myanmar, supported by ASEAN and other regional players.
Quadrilateral Summit: Perhaps most significantly, Minister Sihasak participated in talks with officials from the United States, Malaysia, and Cambodia—a meeting proposed by President Trump to follow up on the fragile ceasefire agreement Thailand reached with Cambodia in Malaysia in July.
Recent Border Crisis Escalation
▼
Timeline of Military Incidents
The current crisis represents a dangerous deterioration from the July ceasefire agreement, with a series of provocative actions that Thai officials describe as systematic violations of sovereignty and territorial integrity.
September 23-27, 2025: Multiple cross-border firing incidents by Cambodian forces, targeting Thai military positions along disputed border areas. Thai officials report these attacks have resulted in casualties among border security personnel.
Daily Surveillance Violations: Cambodian drones conducting systematic reconnaissance flights over Thai territory across multiple border sectors, gathering intelligence on Thai military positions and civilian infrastructure.
Civilian Mobilization: Cambodia’s controversial decision to move civilian populations into disputed border areas, effectively using non-combatants as human shields while expanding territorial claims.
Landmine Deployment: Perhaps most concerning, intelligence reports indicate Cambodia has deployed anti-personnel landmines in violation of the Ottawa Convention, creating long-term threats to civilian populations and complicating any future resolution.
Ottawa Convention Violations
The alleged deployment of landmines by Cambodia represents a serious violation of international humanitarian law. Minister Sihasak’s meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya, who chairs the Ottawa Convention, underscores Thailand’s strategy of using multilateral treaty mechanisms to pressure Cambodia into compliance while demonstrating Thailand’s own commitment to humanitarian demining efforts.
The historical context of the dispute traces back to Thailand’s humanitarian decision in the late 1970s to open its borders to hundreds of thousands of Cambodians fleeing civil war. As Minister Sihasak emotionally recounted to the assembly, “As a young diplomat, I witnessed that scene myself” when Thailand made the compassionate choice to provide shelter despite the enormous burden this placed on Thai communities.
“Thailand chooses the path of peace because we believe that the people of both countries deserve no less. But we really question whether it is the intention of Cambodia to join us in the pursuit for peace.”
— Thailand’s diplomatic challenge to Cambodia
Over the decades, temporary refugee settlements expanded into permanent communities, creating the current territorial disputes. Despite Thailand’s repeated diplomatic protests, Cambodia has ignored requests to address what Thai officials characterize as systematic encroachment on sovereign territory.
Economic Diplomacy Amid Security Crisis
Even as security concerns dominated the agenda, Minister Sihasak demonstrated Thailand’s commitment to comprehensive diplomacy by leading the Thai delegation to a prestigious reception hosted by the US-ASEAN Business Council and US Chamber of Commerce. This event served dual purposes: introducing Thailand’s new government to American business leaders while addressing economic challenges posed by US tariff measures affecting both Thai and American private sectors.
Thailand’s Broader UN Leadership Role
▼
Multilateral Engagement Beyond the Crisis
While the Cambodia border situation dominated headlines, Minister Sihasak’s UN visit showcased Thailand’s broader commitment to international cooperation and institutional reform.
Human Rights Council Leadership: As a member of the UN Human Rights Council for 2025-2027 and Chair of the General Assembly’s Third Committee, Thailand positioned itself as a champion of human rights advancement, particularly focusing on women’s rights, disability inclusion, and health access.
Universal Health Coverage Advocacy: Thailand leveraged its successful domestic health policy experience to promote global pandemic preparedness and support for the WHO Pandemic Agreement, recognizing that future health crises require coordinated international response.
UN Reform Initiative: Supporting the UN80 initiative, Thailand advocated for comprehensive institutional reforms including Security Council restructuring to make the organization more representative, transparent, and effective for 21st-century challenges.
Youth Engagement: Marking the 30th anniversary of the World Programme of Action for Youth, Thailand brought youth delegates to the UNGA, demonstrating commitment to intergenerational governance and youth-driven change.
The confrontation at the UN represents a significant escalation in a dispute that has simmered for decades but now threatens to destabilize one of the world’s most economically dynamic regions. With ASEAN facing multiple challenges from the Myanmar crisis to South China Sea tensions, the Thailand-Cambodia border dispute adds another layer of complexity to regional security architecture.
As the international community watches this diplomatic drama unfold, the fundamental question remains whether Thailand and Cambodia can step back from the brink of renewed conflict and find a path toward the peaceful coexistence that has generally characterized Southeast Asian diplomacy since the end of the Cold War.
