Charlie Kirk speaks before a rally for Former U.S. President Donald Trump at Dream City Church in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S., June 6, 2024.
Charlie Kirk and America’s Turning Point
A nation grapples with tragedy, political violence, and the path forward
Latest Developments
- Suspect in Custody: 22-year-old Tyler Robinson arrested for the killing of Charlie Kirk
- Incident Details: Shooter climbed rooftop at Utah Valley University, shot Kirk during speaking event
- Timeline: Attack occurred around 12 p.m. Mountain Time on September 10, 2025
- Media Fallout: MSNBC fires analyst Matthew Dowd for controversial on-air comments
- Presidential Response: Trump calls Kirk “The Great, and even Legendary, Charlie Kirk”
Another lamented, “Is this how we solve our political differences in America?” From the shattered stained glass of Annunciation Catholic School to the crowded fields of Butler County, Pennsylvania, the heartbreaking answer is too often yes.
And yet evil, whether it slinks across a rooftop or slams into twin skyscrapers, is not new. Two thousand years ago, the prophet Hosea watched his own nation, awash in idolatry, turn its back on God and declared a warning from the Lord, writes Tony Perkins, president of Family Research Council and executive editor of The Washington Stand.
The admonition was as timely then as it is now. Lawlessness, violence, and bloodshed have become so frequent in American life that very little shocks our collective conscience. Yet the assassination of 31-year-old Charlie Kirk, as he peacefully engaged in dialogue on a university campus, is a loss that has stunned millions of Americans across the political spectrum.
As with tragedies before, the responses are predictable โ calls for gun control, demands for more government programs, and appeals for prayer. “I, too, call for prayer. Not because prayer is a slogan to calm emotions, but because genuine prayer positions us to hear God โ and when we listen, He reveals the way forward,” Perkins observes.
Shortly after Charlie Kirk took his dying breath, now-former MSNBC political analyst Matthew Dowd uttered the words on live cable TV that cost him his job, while also providing Americans with a chilling illustration of one of the most common ways the Left legitimizes and thereby encourages political violence against its opponents, according to Mark Tapscott, senior congressional analyst at The Washington Stand.
Shortly after those comments were broadcast, MSNBC issued an apology, followed by Dowd’s termination.
Dowd began his career as a political strategist working for multiple Democrats, but he switched to the GOP to help President George W. Bush win re-election in 2004. More recently, Dowd returned to the Democratic Party and tangled with Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) with remarks in 2019 for which he subsequently apologized.
Method #1: Redefining “Hate Speech”
Tapscott explains how to see precisely how Dowd captured one of the Left’s most terrifying convictions: “Note the progression: Hateful thoughts produce hateful words produce hateful actions. That progression has long been at the heart of the Left’s sabotage of the First Amendment’s guarantee of every American’s right to freedom of expression and opinion.”
What the Left does in this process is redefine what constitutes “hate speech” as anything espoused by those opposed to the Left. “Thus, Matthew Dowd reframed Charlie Kirk’s message โ about the love of Christ, the blessings of individual liberty, and the need for civil debate and tolerance of divergent views โ as the worst hate speech that produces hateful, violent, actions,” Tapscott notes.
“This is how Dowd comes to the position that Kirk’s speech brought on his own assassination,” Tapscott argues. “The assassin who pulled the trigger was merely responding to Kirk’s alleged provocation. Thus, the real perpetrator of political violence is actually the victim of hate speech by the Left’s opponents.”
Method #2: Critical Theory Framework
Tapscott observes that “The Matthew Dowds of the world can make such connections because they operate in the context of the Left’s mindless ideological obsession with identity politics, especially those rooted in critical theory.”
Critical race theory (CRT) argues that America has been a racist society since before its inception; indeed, according to The New York Times and the 1619 Project, it is impossible to conceive of the present America without understanding that white supremacy and chattel slavery are the root of all the country’s major institutions and societal structures.
“The goal of The 1619 Project is to reframe American history by making explicit how slavery is the foundation on which the United States of America is built, and by considering what it would mean to regard 1619 as the nation’s birth year.”
๐ฐ The Reparations Movement
The drive for race-based “reparations” to black Americans for the sufferings of their enslaved ancestors is a direct product of the CRT view that everything about this country has been the result of the abuses by the white majority of the black slave populations and their descendants down to the present day, Tapscott explains.
- California
- Illinois
- Maryland
- New Jersey
- San Francisco
- Palm Springs
- Providence
- Asheville
- Evanston
- $25,000 housing expenses
- Tax fund investments
- Direct lump sum payments
- Targeted job opportunities
But the vast majority of states and municipalities have no interest in establishing race-based reparations programs. Tapscott warns: “How long before teams of screaming leftists point to the marked absence of reparations programs, condemn American society as irretrievably racist, and incite riots, insurrection, and mayhem in major cities across the country? When it happens, the Left will tell us all that it’s our fault, not that of the rioters.”
๐ฏ Remembering Charlie Kirk’s Legacy
Perkins reflects: “This is an incredibly charged moment for our country, but that should not distract from the fact that America is reaping what it has sown. Since the 1960s, a ‘long march through the institutions’ sought to drive God, His word, and His authority from public life. The aim was to relegate faith to the private corners of society, never to influence the classroom, courtroom, or public square.”
“Charlie Kirk and the movement he sparked stood up to the Left’s assault on college campuses,” Perkins notes, “working tirelessly to challenge the godless influence on this generation. Other courageous thought leaders like Rush Limbaugh, Phyllis Schlafly, and Dr. James Dobson also gave voice to truth in a lost world. And while their work stalled the march, it has not stopped it.”
So, how do we stop it and return civility to our nation? “First, we must recognize that while our struggle is waged in political and cultural arenas, its roots are spiritual,” Perkins argues. “Without confronting the spiritual decay at the heart of our crisis, no policy or program will suffice. Scripture provides clear understanding to the people of God: the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty through God to pull down strongholds.”
This requires courage โ to stand unapologetically for truth, yet to resist the temptation to mirror the bitterness of our age. “We must speak truth with conviction, but also with love that disarms hatred,” Perkins counsels.
Perkins concludes: “If our nation is to heal, we cannot let our righteous indignation at this unspeakable tragedy rule. We must not answer anger with anger or bloodshed with more bloodshed. Justice must be upheld, lawlessness restrained, and truth defended โ but the cycle of hatred must be broken. That can only happen when love โ rooted in eternal truth โ guides our actions.”
๐ A Path Forward
Both Perkins and Tapscott call for following Charlie Kirk’s example of civility and reasoned engagement. As Tapscott writes: “Let us instead follow the example left by Charlie Kirk in his continuous civility and reasoned engagement with those who disagreed with him, as Scripture instructs us in 1 Peter 3:15: ‘But in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect.'”
Only then can America find the healing it desperately needs.