Abraham Accords Defense Against Terror Act: U.S. Bill Aims to Boost Middle East Security Cooperation

Washington, D.C. — The United States Congress is considering the Abraham Accords Defense Against Terror Act (HR 4335), a landmark bill designed to expedite arms sales and strengthen security cooperation with Middle Eastern and North African nations that have normalized ties with Israel under the historic Abraham Accords.

The proposed legislation would cut the congressional review period for Foreign Military Sales (FMS) to Abraham Accord partners from 30 days to 15 — the same fast-track status enjoyed by NATO members, Japan, and South Korea. Supporters say this change would reward nations advancing peace and bolster the U.S. strategic position against regional threats, particularly from Iran.

Streamlining Arms Sales to Trusted Partners FMS remains a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy, allowing allies to purchase high-grade American defense equipment that enhances interoperability and stability. However, the current process has faced criticism for delays, complexity, and unpredictability, prompting some U.S. partners to turn to other suppliers.

Under HR 4335, countries actively engaged in counterterrorism efforts and opposing Iran’s destabilizing activities would get priority in arms transfers. Advocates say the bill sends a powerful message of U.S. reliability, incentivizing more nations to join the Abraham Accords.

A New Era of Middle East Diplomacy The Abraham Accords, signed in 2020, marked a diplomatic breakthrough as the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco normalized relations with Israel. U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee praised the UAE as a “forward-thinking partner” and highlighted its unwavering support, including maintaining flights to Israel even during times of regional conflict.

Huckabee also hinted at potential surprises in future expansions of the accords, naming Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, and even Syria as possible candidates once the current Gaza conflict subsides. “Most countries know they’re better off if they normalize their relationships with Israel,” he said, citing UAE’s bold leadership as a model for others.

Support and Opposition Proponents, including Rep. Mike Lawler, call the bill “a critical step toward sustaining momentum in peace-building.” They argue that aligning FMS rules for Abraham Accord partners with those for America’s closest allies will help counter Iranian influence and strengthen security coalitions.

However, critics warn that speeding up arms deals could weaken congressional oversight, particularly regarding nations with contested human rights records or controversial military actions, such as the UAE’s role in Sudan or Egypt’s ties with Russia and China. Human rights advocates caution that reduced scrutiny risks enabling misuse of U.S. weapons in conflict zones.

Strategic Balancing Act The debate over HR 4335 underscores the delicate balance between advancing U.S. security interests and maintaining strict oversight of military exports. While the bill aims to reinforce diplomatic breakthroughs, lawmakers face pressure to ensure accountability and safeguard against unintended consequences.

As the legislation moves through Congress, it remains both a symbolic and practical test of America’s commitment to reshaping Middle East geopolitics — with the promise of deeper alliances, expanded peace agreements, and a united front against shared security threats.