110 Million Meals and Counting: GHF’s Story of Relief, Risk and Resilience

American-Led Initiative Successfully Feeds Half of Gaza’s Population Amid Ongoing Conflict

In the pre-dawn darkness of Gaza, American veterans position thousands of food boxes across four distribution sites while overhead, the reality of an active war zone reminds everyone that this is no ordinary humanitarian mission. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) has achieved something many thought impossible: delivering over 110 million meals to Palestinians without losing a single truck to theft or diversion.

Reverend Johnnie Moore, the foundation’s Executive Chairman and youngest-ever recipient of the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Medal of Valor, spoke candidly about this unprecedented operation during a recent webinar with Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the Center’s Director of Social Action. Their conversation revealed the intricate details of how an American-led initiative has managed to feed approximately 800,000 Gazans while navigating the complex realities of wartime humanitarian work.

How GHF Is Fighting Diversion and Disinformation

The numbers that prompted the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s creation tell a sobering story. According to Moore, ninety-five percent of World Food Program food trucks entering Gaza were being intercepted or diverted before reaching their intended recipients. The United Nations itself reported that eighty-eight percent of all aid entering the Strip faced similar fates, figures that Moore emphasized come directly from UN databases and public disclosures.

“Hamas, a globally designated terrorist organization, was able to take the largesse of the world, take all this free food and humanitarian supplies and use it to either manipulate the people of Gaza, control the people of Gaza, or to resupply and reinforce themselves,” Moore explained to Rabbi Cooper. The terrorist organization would tax incoming aid trucks, allocate portions to their fighters, and control centralized warehousing to maintain power over Gaza’s civilian population.

The foundation’s response was elegantly simple in concept but complex in execution. Rather than competing with existing organizations like the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, GHF designed itself as a complementary force with one focused mission: providing food that Hamas cannot steal. This approach required developing entirely new distribution networks and security protocols that would prove effective in one of the world’s most challenging operational environments.

Moore noted that the foundation’s success in preventing theft and diversion has had broader implications beyond just feeding people. By disrupting Hamas’s control over the food supply, GHF inadvertently contributed to forcing the terrorist organization back to negotiating tables during ceasefire discussions. The foundation’s work demonstrated that effective humanitarian aid delivery in conflict zones does not have to accept high levels of theft and diversion as inevitable costs of doing business.

How Former Special-Forces Teams and Local Partners Feed Gaza Safely

The operational mechanics of feeding hundreds of thousands of people daily in a war zone requires military-level precision and expertise. Moore described to Rabbi Cooper how the foundation’s ground operations begin in the middle of the night, when teams pre-position tens of thousands of boxes across hundreds of pallets at the four distribution sites.

The American team consists entirely of retired military personnel, many with special forces backgrounds who have operated in the world’s most complex environments. These veterans work alongside carefully vetted local Palestinian partners who have proven themselves willing to risk their lives to serve their own communities. The collaboration between American military expertise and local knowledge has proven essential to the foundation’s success.

“The team on the ground is unbelievably experienced,” Moore told Rabbi Cooper, adding that despite United Nations opposition to their work, GHF actually employs many former UN personnel, including individuals who previously worked at UNICEF and other humanitarian organizations. This blend of military operational expertise and humanitarian experience has created a uniquely effective approach to aid distribution.

The foundation operates under a consistent messaging system in Arabic, supplemented by a flag system that signals when distribution sites are open. Green flags indicate active distribution, while separate timeframes accommodate women-only distribution periods that respect local cultural practices while ensuring equitable access to aid. The sites also provide basic first aid services, creating comprehensive support points rather than simple food distribution locations.

Tragically, the foundation’s success has come at a cost for local partners. Six weeks before Moore’s conversation with Rabbi Cooper, Hamas hunted down and killed twelve local Gazan aid workers in what Moore described as an attempt to intimidate others from working with or receiving aid from GHF. Despite this devastating loss, local Palestinian partners continue showing up daily to serve their communities, displaying what Moore characterized as extraordinary courage in the face of terrorist threats.

Humanitarian Innovation in Conflict: GHF’s Strategy to Keep Food out of the Hands of Militants

The foundation’s approach represents a fundamental shift in how humanitarian organizations can operate in conflict zones controlled by militant groups. Traditional humanitarian work often accepts high levels of aid diversion as an unavoidable reality, but GHF’s model demonstrates that alternative approaches can be both effective and necessary.

Moore explained to Rabbi Cooper that the foundation’s relationship with the Israeli Defense Forces mirrors what other humanitarian organizations have historically maintained: a deconfliction relationship focused on operational coordination rather than political alignment. The key difference lies in GHF’s unwillingness to turn a blind eye to aid diversion that ultimately benefits terrorist organizations.

“Our sin is that we’re unwilling to turn a blind eye to the fact that Hamas can steal food to put pressure on local people, to prolong a war, to imperil all of them,” Moore said, characterizing this stance as what sets GHF apart from traditional humanitarian approaches.

The foundation has also developed what Moore described as an “Uber for aid” system through community distribution mechanisms. This network works with vetted local partners to deliver aid boxes directly to elderly individuals, families with young children, and others who cannot safely travel to distribution sites. This innovation ensures that the most vulnerable populations receive assistance regardless of their mobility or security concerns.

The foundation’s success in maintaining zero truck thefts while delivering millions of meals demonstrates that effective humanitarian aid distribution is possible even in the most challenging environments. This model could potentially be replicated in other conflict zones where traditional humanitarian approaches have struggled with similar diversion problems.

A Faith-Driven Response: Reverend Moore on Why the U.S.-Led Effort Matters

When Rabbi Cooper asked about the personal motivations driving his involvement in such a dangerous mission, Reverend Moore’s response revealed the deep faith convictions underlying the foundation’s work. As a Christian leader who has long worked on Middle East peace initiatives, Moore sees feeding people as fundamental to his religious calling.

“There’s nothing more Christian than feeding people,” Moore told Rabbi Cooper, explaining his decision to volunteer for this role despite significant personal risks. The threats against Moore’s life have become so serious that law enforcement has placed him under round-the-clock protection, but he remains committed to the mission based on his understanding of Christian responsibility to serve others.

Moore’s broader vision extends beyond immediate humanitarian relief to systemic reform of how international aid operates in conflict zones. He argued that current humanitarian structures often inadvertently prolong conflicts by allowing aid to be diverted for military purposes, citing examples from Ethiopia, Yemen, Afghanistan, and Somalia where similar problems have contributed to extended violence.

“If these bureaucrats would have decided to just work with us in the very beginning, a lot of lives would have been saved,” Moore said, expressing frustration with United Nations officials who have boycotted cooperation with GHF despite the foundation’s demonstrated effectiveness. This resistance has made scaling operations more difficult and potentially cost lives that could have been saved through expanded food distribution.

The foundation’s experience highlights broader questions about how humanitarian organizations should balance traditional diplomatic relationships with the practical imperative to help people in need. Moore’s willingness to operate outside established humanitarian structures, while maintaining the same operational standards, suggests that innovation in this field may require accepting criticism from traditional actors who prioritize institutional relationships over immediate humanitarian impact.

The Broader Implications of Success

The conversation between Moore and Rabbi Cooper revealed that GHF’s work extends far beyond its immediate humanitarian mission. By demonstrating that effective aid distribution is possible without high levels of theft and diversion, the foundation has inadvertently challenged fundamental assumptions about how humanitarian work must operate in conflict zones.

Moore noted that the foundation’s success in flooding Gaza with food likely contributed to Hamas returning to ceasefire negotiations, though he emphasized that GHF remains strictly non-political in its mission. This example illustrates how effective humanitarian work can have strategic implications without requiring political objectives, suggesting that meeting people’s basic needs may be one of the most powerful tools for creating conditions conducive to peace.

The foundation’s model also addresses a critical gap in international humanitarian architecture. While organizations like UNICEF focus on children’s needs and Doctors Without Borders provides medical care, GHF has carved out a specific niche in food security that prioritizes preventing aid diversion. This specialization has allowed them to develop expertise and operational approaches that traditional multi-mandate organizations might struggle to implement.

Looking forward, Moore expressed hope that more donor nations will support GHF’s work as its effectiveness becomes increasingly clear. The foundation currently operates primarily with American government backing, though other nations provide support that they have not yet disclosed publicly. Expanding international support could enable the foundation to serve more people and potentially replicate its model in other conflict zones facing similar challenges.

The story of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, as told through the dialogue between Reverend Moore and Rabbi Cooper, ultimately represents more than successful food distribution statistics. It demonstrates how innovation, courage, and unwavering focus on serving people in need can overcome seemingly impossible obstacles. As Moore concluded their conversation, “We pray like everything depends upon God and we work like everything depends upon us.”

Their success in delivering 110 million meals without losing a single truck to theft proves that effective humanitarian work in the world’s most challenging environments is not just possible but achievable when the right combination of expertise, local partnerships, and unwavering commitment comes together in service of a clear mission: feeding people who need food.

About The Author